En aquesta pàgina web hi ha una àmplia selecció bibliogràfica sobre qüestions cienciomètriques.
Bailón-Moreno, Rafael; Encarnación Jurado-Alameda, Rosario Ruiz-Baños & Jean-Pierre Courtial. 2005. “Bibliometric laws: Empirical flaws of fit”. @ Scientometrics 63/2, 209-229. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-005-0211-5 [+info] [quod vide]
Cooke, Steven & Michael R. Donaldson. 2014. “Self-citation by researchers: narcissism or an inevitable outcome of a cohesive and sustained research program?” @ Ideas in Ecology and Evolution 7/1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4033/iee.2014.7.1.e [quod vide]
*De Bellis, Nicola. 2009. Bibliometrics and Citation Analysis: From the Science Citation Index to Cybermetrics. Lanham: Scarecrow Press. [+info]
Frame, John Davidson. 1977. “Mainstream research in Latin America and the Caribbean”. @ Interciencia 2/3, 143-148. [+info]
Franco Aixelá, Javier. 2013. “Who’s who and what’s what in Translation Studies: A preliminary approach”. @ Way, Catherine, Sonia Vandepitte, Reine Meylaerts et al. (eds.) 2013. Tracks and Treks in Translation Studies, 7-28. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI: 10.1075/btl.108.01aix [+info]
*Franco Aixelá, Javier & Sara Rovira-Esteva. 2015. “Publishing and impact criteria, and their bearing on translation studies: In search of comparability”. @ Perspectives: Studies in Translatology 23/2, 265-283. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0907676X.2014.972419 [+info]
Garfield, Eugene & Irving H. Sher. 1963. “New factors in the evaluation of scientific literature through citation indexing”. @ American Documentation 14, 195-201. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.5090140304 [+info] [quod vide]
Gile, Daniel. 1999. “Use and misuse of the literature in interpreting research”. @ The Interpreters’ Newsletter 9, 29-43. [+info] [quod vide]
Gile, Daniel. 2000. “The history of research into conference interpreting: A scientometric approach”. @ Target 12/2, 297-321. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/target.12.2.07gil [+info]
Gile, Daniel. 2005. "Citation Patterns in the T&I Didactics Literature". @ Forum 3/2, 85-103. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/forum.3.2.05gil [+info] [quod vide]
Gile, Daniel. 2006. "L'interdisciplinarité en traductologie. Une optique scientométrique". @ Kasar, Sündüz Öztürk (ed.) 2006. Interdisciplinarité en traduction, 23-37. Istanbul: Isis. [+info]
Grbić, Nadja. 2013. “Bibliometrics”. @ Gambier, Yves & Luc van Doorslaer (eds.) 2013. Handbook of Translation Studies 4, 20-24. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/hts.4.bib2 [+info]
Grbić, Nadja & Sonja Pöllabauer. 2008a. “Counting what counts: Research on community interpreting in German-speaking countries. A Scientometric study”. @ Target 20/2, 297-332. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/target.20.2.06grb [+info]
*Grbić, Nadja & Sonja Pöllabauer. 2008b. “To count or not to count: Scientometrics as a methodological tool for investigating research on translation and interpreting”. @ Translation and Interpreting Studies 3/1-2, 87-146. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/tis.3.1-2.04grb [+info]
Hirsch, Jorge E. 2005. “An index to quantify an individual’s scientific research output”. @ Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences Nov 2005 102/46, 16569-16572. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0507655102 [+info] [quod vide]
Huang, Qin & Furong Liu. 2019. “International translation studies from 2014 to 2018: A bibliometric analysis and its implications”. @ Translation Review 105/1, 34-57. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/07374836.2019.1664959 [+info]
Martín-Martín, Alberto, Enrique Orduña-Malea, Mike Thelwall & Emilio Delgado López Cózar. 2018. “Google Scholar, Web of Science, and Scopus: A systematic comparison of citations in 252 subject categories”. @ Journal of Informetrics 12/4, 1160-1177. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2018.09.002 [+info] [quod vide]
McVeigh, Marie E. 2004. Open Access Journals in the ISI Citation Databases: Analysis of Impact Factors and Citation Patterns. Stamford (Connecticut): Thomson Corporation. [quod vide]
*Mellinger, Christopher D. & Thomas A. Hanson. 2017. Quantitative Research Methods in Translation and Interpreting Studies. New York: Routledge. [+info]
Mongeon, Philippe & Adèle Paul-Hus. 2016. “The journal coverage of Web of Science and Scopus: a comparative analysis”. @ Scientometrics 106/1, 213-228. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-015-1765-5 [+info] [quod vide]
Otlet, Paul. 1934. Traité de Documentation. Bruxelles: Editiones Mundaneum. [+info] [quod vide]
Pöchhacker, Franz. 1995. “Those who do... A profile of research(ers) in interpreting”. @ Target 7/1, 47-64. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/target.7.1.05poc [+info]
Pöchhacker, Franz. 1995. “Writings and research in interpreting: A bibliographic analysis”. @ The Interpreters’ Newsletter 6, 17-31. [+info] [quod vide]
*Pritchard, Alan. 1969. “Statistical Bibliography or Bibliometrics?” @ Journal of Documentation 25/4, 348-349. [+info]
Rovira-Esteva, Sara & Pilar Orero. 2011. "A contrastive analysis of the main benchmarking tools for research assessment in translation and interpreting: the Spanish approach". @ Perspectives: Studies in Translatology 19/3, 233-251. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0907676X.2011.590214 [+info]
Rovira-Esteva, Sara; Pilar Orero & Javier Franco Aixelá (eds.) 2015. Bibliometric and Bibliographical Research in Translation Studies. @ Perspectives: Studies in Translatology 23/2. [+info]
*Rovira-Esteva, Sara; Javier Franco Aixelá & Christian Olalla-Soler. 2019. “Citation patterns in translation studies: a format-dependent bibliometric analysis”. @ The International Journal for Translation & Interpreting Research 11/1, 147-171. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12807/ti.111201.2019.a09 [+info] [quod vide]
Rovira-Esteva, Sara & Javier Franco Aixelá. 2018. “Bibliometric tools (evaluation, mapping, research funding)”. @ Gambier, Yves & Lieven D’hulst (eds.) 2018. History of Translation Knowledge: A Dictionary, 117-122. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. [+info] [quod vide]
Sajkevic, Anatolij JA. 1992. “Bibliometric analysis of index translationum”. @ Meta 37/1, 67-96. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7202/004017ar [+info] [quod vide]
Schubert, Andreas & Tibor Braun. 1986. “Relative indicators and relational charts for comparative assessment of publication output and citation impact”. @ Scientometrics 9, 281-291. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02017249 [quod vide]
Van Doorslaer, Luc. 2015. “Bibliometric studies”. @ Angelelli, Claudia V. & Brian James Baer (eds.) 2015. Researching Translation and Interpreting, 168-176. London & New York: Routledge. [+info]
Van Eck, Nees Jan & Ludo Waltman. 2010. “Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping”. @ Scientometrics 84, 523-538. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-0146-3 [+info] [quod vide]
Vinkler, Peter. 2004. “Characterization of the impact of sets of scientific papers: The Garfield (Impact) Factor”. @ Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.10391 [+info]
*Vinkler, Peter. 2009. The Evaluation of Research by Scientometric Indicators. Oxford: Chandos Publishing. [+info]
Waltman, Ludo & Nees Jan van Eck. 2013. “A systematic empirical comparison of different approaches for normalizing citation impact indicators”. @ Journal of Informetrics 7/4, 833-849. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2013.08.002 [+info] [quod vide]